The Road from ἔνδοξα to ἐπιστήμη: The Place of Dialectic in Aristotelian Epistemology
The purpose of this paper is to argue for the necessity of dialectic in Aristotelian philosophy - dialectic defined as the art of arguing from probable opinions to contradictory conclusions (100a30; 101b4; 164b3-4). In particular, I will argue that dialectic is necessary for definition. In the Poste...
| Autres titres: | The Road from endoxa to epistēmē$dThe Place of Dialectic in Aristotelian Epistemology |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Année: 2018, Volume: 92, Pages: 99-109 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | The purpose of this paper is to argue for the necessity of dialectic in Aristotelian philosophy - dialectic defined as the art of arguing from probable opinions to contradictory conclusions (100a30; 101b4; 164b3-4). In particular, I will argue that dialectic is necessary for definition. In the Posterior Analytics, Aristotle identifies three principles of scientific demonstration: axioms, un-middled premises, and definitions. In showing the need for dialectic to define, I also show scientific knowledge’s dependence on dialectic. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2153-7925 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: American Catholic Philosophical Association, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/acpaproc201892101 |