A thousand tiny sexes, a trillion tiny Jesuses, and the queer Gospel of Mark
Queer theory’s standard origin story centers on Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, and Teresa de Lauretis. This article proceeds down a less-traveled road, one yet to be explored in biblical studies. Like standard queer theory, this trajectory’s roots are also in French thought—n...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sheffield Institute for Interdisciplinary Biblical Studies
2021
|
| In: |
Journal for interdisciplinary biblical studies (JIBS)
Year: 2021, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 138-168 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Foucault, Michel 1926-1984
/ Butler, Judith 1956-
/ Biblical studies
/ Feminism
/ The Humanities
/ Science of Religion
/ Interdisciplinary research
/ Queer theory
/ Mark
|
| IxTheo Classification: | FD Contextual theology HC New Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Queer theory’s standard origin story centers on Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, and Teresa de Lauretis. This article proceeds down a less-traveled road, one yet to be explored in biblical studies. Like standard queer theory, this trajectory’s roots are also in French thought—not that of Foucault or Jacques Lacan, however, but of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. The difference this makes is considerable, yielding, among other things, a concept of the gendered body that is neither discursive (à la Foucault) nor performative (à la Butler) but virtual; a concept of sexuality that exceeds the human/nonhuman binary no less than the heterosexual/homosexual binary; and an alternative version of the antisocial thesis in queer theory that precedes Lee Edelman’s influential Lacanian version by more than thirty years, namely, Guy Hocquenghem’s Deleuzoguattarian version. How might all or any of this translate into queer biblical reading? Addressing this question through an extended analysis of the Gospel of Mark is the principal project of this article. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2633-0695 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for interdisciplinary biblical studies (JIBS)
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17613/rdyr-xh46 |