Il Vangelo dei Segni e i suoi predecessori: La Semeia-Quelle come rilettura post-70 di Marco e di Q : [I parte]
This two-part essay puts forth a new perspective on the pre-Johannine Signs Gospel. This first part presents reasons for thinking that the Signs Gospel knew the Gospel of Mark, and, to a lesser extent, the Sayings Source Q. It argues that the relationship between these texts should be conceived in t...
| Subtitles: | Early Christianity |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Ed. Dehoniane
2020
|
| In: |
Annali di storia dell'esegesi
Year: 2020, Volume: 37, Issue: 2, Pages: 339-379 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Transtextualität
/ Bible. Johannesevangelium 1,19-12,15
/ Q
/ John
/ Mark
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
| Summary: | This two-part essay puts forth a new perspective on the pre-Johannine Signs Gospel. This first part presents reasons for thinking that the Signs Gospel knew the Gospel of Mark, and, to a lesser extent, the Sayings Source Q. It argues that the relationship between these texts should be conceived in terms of hypertextuality, i.e. as a relecture by which the author of the Signs Gospel accepted and reshaped only those parts that were suitable to the messianic propaganda he intended in his text. The second part of this essay, which will appear in the next issue, will offer a series of historical considerations on the post-70 context in which the Signs Gospel was written, its hope for the rebuilding of the Jerusalem temple, the Baptist matrix of the group that produced it, and the historical value of the (residual) non-synoptic tradition it conveys. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1120-4001 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Annali di storia dell'esegesi
|