The State and Marriage: Cut the Connection
I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance s...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Tyndale House
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Tyndale bulletin
Année: 2017, Volume: 68, Numéro: 1, Pages: 95-119 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Mariage
/ État
/ Droit
/ Abolition
|
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Marriage
Religious aspects
Christianity
B Marriage law B Peer reviewed B Church and state |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
| Résumé: | I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance several arguments for this thesis, and then respond to many possible objections. I do not argue for any change in any of the typical Western laws respecting sexual intercourse; in particular, I do not argue for any change in the laws regarding rape, the age of consent to intercourse or intercourse with a minor. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0082-7118 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
|