The State and Marriage: Cut the Connection
I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Tyndale House
[2017]
|
| In: |
Tyndale bulletin
Year: 2017, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 95-119 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Marriage
/ State
/ Law
/ Abolition of
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NCF Sexual ethics XA Law |
| Further subjects: | B
Marriage
Religious aspects
Christianity
B Marriage law B Peer reviewed B Church and state |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | I argue that the connection between the state and the institution of marriage should be cut. More precisely, I argue that the state should not (I) solemnise or purport to solemnise any marriages, (II) register any marriages and (III) make any laws, civil or criminal, respecting marriage. I advance several arguments for this thesis, and then respond to many possible objections. I do not argue for any change in any of the typical Western laws respecting sexual intercourse; in particular, I do not argue for any change in the laws regarding rape, the age of consent to intercourse or intercourse with a minor. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0082-7118 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Could Marriage Be Disestablished? (2017)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
|