Directed Reflective Equilibrium: Thought Experiments and How to Use Them
Abstract In this paper we develop a new methodology for normative theorising, which we call Directed Reflective Equilibrium. Directed Reflective Equilibrium is based on a taxonomy that distinguishes between a number of different functions of hypothetical cases, including two dimensions that we call...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | ; ; |
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado em: |
2021
|
Em: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Ano: 2021, Volume: 18, Número: 1, Páginas: 1-25 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Reflective Equilibrium
B hypothetical cases B Methodology B Intuitions |
Acesso em linha: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (Publisher) |
Resumo: | Abstract In this paper we develop a new methodology for normative theorising, which we call Directed Reflective Equilibrium. Directed Reflective Equilibrium is based on a taxonomy that distinguishes between a number of different functions of hypothetical cases, including two dimensions that we call representation and elicitation. Like its predecessor, Directed Reflective Equilibrium accepts that neither intuitions nor basic principles are immune to revision and that our commitments on various levels of philosophical enquiry should be brought into equilibrium. However, it also offers guidance about how different types of cases ought to be sequenced to achieve this result. We argue that this ‘directional’ approach improves, in various ways, upon the non-directional approach of traditional Reflective Equilibrium. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5243 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of moral philosophy
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455243_20203008 HDL: 11343/281550 |