Systematic Theology and Biblical Theology—Part Two
In many times and various ways, some significant Reformed theologians have claimed that biblical theology must be coordinated with or contribute to the task of systematic theology. In these last days, they have even suggested that biblical theology should fill the place of systematic theology. Part...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2020
|
In: |
Journal of reformed theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 14, Issue: 4, Pages: 344-357 |
IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDD Protestant Church NAA Systematic theology |
Further subjects: | B
John Murray
B Richard Gaffin B Systematic Theology B Geerhardus Vos B Biblical Theology B Dogmatics B Exegesis B theological interpretation of scripture |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | In many times and various ways, some significant Reformed theologians have claimed that biblical theology must be coordinated with or contribute to the task of systematic theology. In these last days, they have even suggested that biblical theology should fill the place of systematic theology. Part One described the way in which Geerhardus Vos, John Murray, and Richard Gaffin have addressed the role of biblical theology in relation to systematic theology and analyzed their arguments. This essay will offer counterproposals regarding the origin, mainstreaming, and end of biblical theology (and theological interpretation of scripture) as exegetical therapies meant to serve the functioning of dogmatics and exegesis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1569-7312 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of reformed theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15697312-bja10005 |