O fundamentalismo como proselitismo de legitimação: o que há de comunicação na incomunicabilidade religiosa
This paper studies fundamentalism, from the perspective of the tension between communicability and incommunicability, perceived in the religious dynamics in general. After a brief historical background on the subject, it focuses on the religious side of fundamentalism. Next, fundamentalism is approa...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Португальский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2020]
|
| В: |
Horizonte
Год: 2020, Том: 18, Выпуск: 56, Страницы: 485-512 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Фундаментализм (мотив)
/ Миссия (международное право)
/ Способность к общению
/ Межрелигиозный диалог
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AD Социология религии AG Религиозная жизнь AX Межрелигиозные отношения CH Христианство и общество ZB Социология ZC Общая политика |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Comunicabilidade religiosa
B Fundamentalismo B Dogmatismo B Incomunicabilidade religiosa B Modernidade |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | This paper studies fundamentalism, from the perspective of the tension between communicability and incommunicability, perceived in the religious dynamics in general. After a brief historical background on the subject, it focuses on the religious side of fundamentalism. Next, fundamentalism is approached in the context of its specific contradiction: the incommunicability of dogmatism, based on literalism, the incapacity for dialogue and extremist political actions, including terrorism, in permanent tension with the communicational need for visibility and recognition. Therefore, there is a specific communicational condition within the incommunicability of the processes of dogmatization and dialogical closure inscribed in fundamentalist phenomena. We call this a communicative propensity to promote incommunicability. Finally, religious fundamentalism is postulated as a proselytizing of legitimation, tensioning the poles between dogma and bond, by adopting, contradictorily, the radicalization of both, and testing the limits of tolerance in modernity |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2175-5841 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Horizonte
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2020v18n56p485 |
