Paul Not Already Justified? The Text of Philippians 3:12 in the Major Greek-Latin Bilingual Codices of the Pauline Letters
Four Greek-Latin bilingual manuscripts of the Pauline Letters attest to a fascinating reading at Phil 3:12 known as the justification clause. Scholars have labeled the reading “intriguing,” “very interesting,” “striking,” and “astounding” since it has Paul declaring he has not already been justified...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Eisenbrauns
[2020]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
Year: 2020, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 57-71 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Justification
/ Paul Apostle
/ Bible. Philipperbrief 3,12
/ Textual criticism
/ Greek language
/ Latin
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Sangermanensis
B Textual Criticism B Apostle Paul B Augiensis B Claromontanus B Justification B Philippians B Boernerianus |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Four Greek-Latin bilingual manuscripts of the Pauline Letters attest to a fascinating reading at Phil 3:12 known as the justification clause. Scholars have labeled the reading “intriguing,” “very interesting,” “striking,” and “astounding” since it has Paul declaring he has not already been justified (or made/found righteous). Most scholars have rejected the reading as part of the earliest text of Philippians due to its absence from an overwhelming majority of witnesses and (alleged) departure from Paul’s understanding of justification. However, numerous scholars have recognized unconscious alteration due to homoioteleuton or homoioarcton as at least possible here, and no scholar has issued a direct argument against it. A close analysis of the Greek readings in the four Greek-Latin bilingual codices demonstrates how such an alteration could have easily taken place. This article provides that analysis, revealing that all four codices exhibit an abundance of shared orthographic and lexical data in this portion of the verse when the clause is present, and all four attest to a different form of the reading. The variety of forms are best explained as unintentional alterations, thus lending credibility to the explanation that the clause was omitted early in the tradition. When considered alongside the clause’s remarkably early attestation in P46 and Irenaeus, and its internal coherence with other Pauline references to final justification at the last judgment, the argument should provide some caution against hastily dismissing this intriguing reading. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2576-7941 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of Paul and his letters
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5325/jstudpaullett.10.1.0057 |