Nygren and Oord on Love: A Critique
This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons a...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| 出版: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Process studies
Year: 2020, 卷: 49, 發布: 2, Pages: 275-291 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Nygren, Anders 1890-1978
/ Oord, Thomas Jay 1965-
/ 愛
|
| IxTheo Classification: | TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons are developed of related biological relationships like mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process202049213 |
