Nygren and Oord on Love: A Critique
This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Process studies
Year: 2020, Volume: 49, Issue: 2, Pages: 275-291 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Nygren, Anders 1890-1978
/ Oord, Thomas Jay 1965-
/ Love
|
| IxTheo Classification: | TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons are developed of related biological relationships like mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process202049213 |
