Nygren and Oord on Love: A Critique
This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons a...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Process studies
Anno: 2020, Volume: 49, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 275-291 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Nygren, Anders 1890-1978
/ Oord, Thomas Jay 1965-
/ Amore
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | TK Età contemporanea VA Filosofia |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons are developed of related biological relationships like mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process202049213 |
