Nygren and Oord on Love: A Critique
This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons a...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Process studies
Année: 2020, Volume: 49, Numéro: 2, Pages: 275-291 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Nygren, Anders 1890-1978
/ Oord, Thomas Jay 1965-
/ Amour
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | TK Époque contemporaine VA Philosophie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Maison d'édition) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons are developed of related biological relationships like mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process202049213 |
