Nygren and Oord on Love: A Critique
This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons a...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
[2020]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Process studies
Έτος: 2020, Τόμος: 49, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 275-291 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Nygren, Anders 1890-1978
/ Oord, Thomas Jay 1965-
/ Αγάπη (μοτίβο)
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΤΚ Σύγχρονη Εποχή VA Φιλοσοφία |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | This article offers a critique of Anders Nygrens influential theory of love, which radically distinguishes among ^ros, agape, and philm. By contrast, a defense is offered of Thomas Jay Oord's view, which I label "kenotically donated love" or "full-Oorded" love. Comparisons are developed of related biological relationships like mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process202049213 |
