Religious Pluralism and State Paternalism in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan's government is proud of the existing model of interfaith relations and uses it for claiming legitimacy at home and shaping the country's image abroad. To compare it with the covenantal pluralism ideal as outlined by W. Christopher Stewart, Chris Seiple, and Dennis R. Hoover, we...
Publicado no: | The review of faith & international affairs |
---|---|
Authors: | ; |
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2020]
|
Em: |
The review of faith & international affairs
Ano: 2020, Volume: 18, Número: 4, Páginas: 63-73 |
Classificações IxTheo: | AD Sociologia da religião AF Geografia da religião AX Relações inter-religiosas KBK Europa oriental ZC Política geral |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Religious Minorities
B inter-faith dialogue B covenantal pluralism B Soviet policies B state paternalism B Kazakhstan |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Resumo: | Kazakhstan's government is proud of the existing model of interfaith relations and uses it for claiming legitimacy at home and shaping the country's image abroad. To compare it with the covenantal pluralism ideal as outlined by W. Christopher Stewart, Chris Seiple, and Dennis R. Hoover, we consider both top-down dimensions (legal regulations of the religious sphere) and bottom-up dimensions (focusing on relational dynamics and interfaith dialogues). We find major discrepancies and argue that state paternalism, in-built hierarchies, and widespread suspicions and prejudices against religious minorities, inherited from the Soviet times, remain key features of the Kazakhstan model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1931-7743 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: The review of faith & international affairs
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2020.1835023 |