Ambiguities of Prophecy: Old Testament Rhetoric in the American Founding Era
Scholars have long recognized the impact of Hebrew prophecy on the rhetoric of the American Founding era, but they have assumed it is all of one type, the American Jeremiad, a clarion call for political action. In fact, biblical rhetoric during this era mirrors three types of Old Testament prophecy...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
In: |
Politics and religion
Anno: 2020, Volume: 13, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 575-603 |
(sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
USA
/ Bibel. Jeremia
/ Profezia
/ Protestantesimo
/ Retorica
/ Eccezionalismo americano
|
Notazioni IxTheo: | CG Cristianesimo e politica HB Antico Testamento KBQ America settentrionale ZC Politica generale |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Edizione parallela: | Elettronico
|
Riepilogo: | Scholars have long recognized the impact of Hebrew prophecy on the rhetoric of the American Founding era, but they have assumed it is all of one type, the American Jeremiad, a clarion call for political action. In fact, biblical rhetoric during this era mirrors three types of Old Testament prophecy formulated at three distinct moments in ancient Biblical history: before, during, and after the Babylonian Exile of 587 BCE. I refer to these as repentance, Jeremiad, and disappointment. I interpret sermons by three leading Protestant ministers in order to demonstrate that all three types of Hebraic prophecy were prevalent during this era, but only one of them, the Jeremiad, seeks to inspire political action; second, the Jeremiad was prominent only during the Revolutionary War. Before the war, and after the ratification of the Constitution, the two quietistic modes of prophecy, repentance, and disappointment, are more prevalent. I conclude by speculating about what the American founders might think of the contemporary rhetorical landscape, where the Jeremiad has become dominant, drowning out more moderate forms of biblical discourse. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-0491 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Politics and religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S1755048320000024 |