Citing Sarah in the New Testament and Rabbinic Literature: Does Original Context Matter?

This article treats the reference to the Jewish matriarch Sarah in 1 Pet 3,5-6, long a crux interpretum in NT studies, as a test case in the larger methodological question of interpreting ancient writers’ uses of biblical verses. Whereas some biblical scholars assert that we cannot understand a quot...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bar Asher Sigal, Mikhal 1979- (Author) ; Dinkler, Michal Beth 1979- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters [2020]
In: Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses
Year: 2020, Volume: 96, Issue: 3, Pages: 443-457
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Sarah / Rabbinic literature / Interpretation of
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
HC New Testament
HD Early Judaism
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This article treats the reference to the Jewish matriarch Sarah in 1 Pet 3,5-6, long a crux interpretum in NT studies, as a test case in the larger methodological question of interpreting ancient writers’ uses of biblical verses. Whereas some biblical scholars assert that we cannot understand a quotation or allusion in a biblical text unless we also consider its original context, others insist that the original context of a received text is irrelevant because ancient Jewish biblical interpreters regularly took small textual details as launching points for wholly new interpretations. We want to challenge both sides of this methodological debate. Biblical scholars err when representing this issue in an 'all or nothing' fashion, as though one particular interpretive strategy (decontextualizing or evoking context) could ever typify one particular tradition (Jewish or Christian). We show that rabbinic interpreters and writers of New Testament texts employ various reading practices, drawing on or disregarding original contexts according to which strategy will be most rhetorically efficacious in a given moment. A comparative look at such questions not only allows for better and more nuanced understandings of each source individually, but can also help trace the trajectories of certain interpretive readings in the different communities of Late Antiquity.
ISSN:1783-1423
Contains:Enthalten in: Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/ETL.96.3.3288585