Re-examining Ambrose’s Ep. 24. The Exceptional Case of the Bishop’s Hearing
Ep. 24 was not simply the record of the dispute and it was entangled with unclear sentences which sometimes confused previous researches. The present study will specify the cause of its confusion and will argue the possibility of the change of the point at issue. As a result, it becomes clear that t...
| Published in: | Scrinium |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2020, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 58-66 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CG Christianity and Politics KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KBJ Italy RB Church office; congregation SA Church law; state-church law |
| Further subjects: | B
episcopalis audientia
B the bishop’s hearing B Ambrose of Milan B the donation to the church |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Ep. 24 was not simply the record of the dispute and it was entangled with unclear sentences which sometimes confused previous researches. The present study will specify the cause of its confusion and will argue the possibility of the change of the point at issue. As a result, it becomes clear that the case of Ep. 24 was the exceptional one of the bishop’s hearing in which bishop’s judgement was tended to be unfair to one interested party and the result of its dispute was not necessarily dependent upon Ambrose’s authority as a bishop. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scrinium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00160A18 |