Does Human Soul Have an Owner?: Patristic Anthropology and Wittgenstein on the Human Identity
In the mainstream anthropology of Byzantine patristics, the human “I” is twice inconsistent, being identical to but different from a “part of God” and, in the created world, being not a something while without being a nothing. The latter kind of inconsistency was described as well by Ludwig Wittgens...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
[2020]
|
In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2020, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 30-47 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBE Anthropology TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Free Will
B patristic anthropology B Gregory of Nazianzus B Subject B Wittgenstein |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | In the mainstream anthropology of Byzantine patristics, the human “I” is twice inconsistent, being identical to but different from a “part of God” and, in the created world, being not a something while without being a nothing. The latter kind of inconsistency was described as well by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his peculiar doctrine of subjectivity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Scrinium
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00160A03 |