A Response to Joseph M. Lear, ‘Liturgy with Ruth: Immigration and the Problem of Anti-Eucharist’
In this response to Joseph Lear, Tommy Casarez praises Lear’s use of the phrase, ‘anti-eucharist’, and his claim that we live in an anti-eucharist culture, or something akin to Madonna’s material world. Noting the significance of food and common meals in Scripture, Casarez points out that Ruth is no...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
Journal of pentecostal theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 206-210 |
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament NBP Sacramentology; sacraments NCE Business ethics RC Liturgy |
| Further subjects: | B
Ruth
B Immigration B Eucharist B Capitalism B Liberalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In this response to Joseph Lear, Tommy Casarez praises Lear’s use of the phrase, ‘anti-eucharist’, and his claim that we live in an anti-eucharist culture, or something akin to Madonna’s material world. Noting the significance of food and common meals in Scripture, Casarez points out that Ruth is not only and not primarily a recipient but also a contributor. Lear is commended for his description of a space-making ethic, with the eucharist serving as a space-making event that essentially defines the shape and character of the Christian way of life. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5251 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of pentecostal theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455251-02902003 |