Is there a problem of creatio ex nihilo? A reply to Pao-Shen Ho

Pao-Shen Ho attempts to argue that the Christian doctrine of creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) violates modal logic and is necessarily false. More precisely, Ho argues that, if God creates the universe out of nothing, then the non-existence of the universe is both possible and impossible,...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Erasmus, Jacobus (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2020]
Dans: International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 88, Numéro: 2, Pages: 215-218
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Création ex nihilo / Modalité / Logique
Classifications IxTheo:AB Philosophie de la religion
NBC Dieu
NBD Création
Sujets non-standardisés:B Pao-Shen Ho
B Kalam Cosmological Argument
B Création ex nihilo
B Creation out of nothing
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:Pao-Shen Ho attempts to argue that the Christian doctrine of creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) violates modal logic and is necessarily false. More precisely, Ho argues that, if God creates the universe out of nothing, then the non-existence of the universe is both possible and impossible, which is logically incoherent. I point out, however, that Ho commits the (all too common) modal scope fallacy by confusing the scope of necessity in the argument and, therefore, Ho's argument is unsound.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-019-09741-y