Is there a problem of creatio ex nihilo? A reply to Pao-Shen Ho

Pao-Shen Ho attempts to argue that the Christian doctrine of creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) violates modal logic and is necessarily false. More precisely, Ho argues that, if God creates the universe out of nothing, then the non-existence of the universe is both possible and impossible,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Erasmus, Jacobus (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2020]
En: International journal for philosophy of religion
Año: 2020, Volumen: 88, Número: 2, Páginas: 215-218
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Creación del nada / Modalidad / Lógica
Clasificaciones IxTheo:AB Filosofía de la religión
NBC Dios
NBD Creación
Otras palabras clave:B Pao-Shen Ho
B Creación del nada
B Kalam Cosmological Argument
B Creation out of nothing
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Descripción
Sumario:Pao-Shen Ho attempts to argue that the Christian doctrine of creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) violates modal logic and is necessarily false. More precisely, Ho argues that, if God creates the universe out of nothing, then the non-existence of the universe is both possible and impossible, which is logically incoherent. I point out, however, that Ho commits the (all too common) modal scope fallacy by confusing the scope of necessity in the argument and, therefore, Ho's argument is unsound.
ISSN:1572-8684
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-019-09741-y