Modern orthodoxy and morality: an uneasy partnership

Modern orthodoxy often perceives itself and is perceived by others as a movement which grants more importance to moral considerations in its interpretation of halakha and in its general worldview than does the ultra-orthodox movement. Accordingly, modern orthodox rabbis are often referred to as more...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Sṭaṭman, Dāniyyêl (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: [2020]
Dans: International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 88, Numéro: 2, Pages: 167-180
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Judaïsme orthodoxe / Modernité / Halakha / Conservatisme
B Wurzburger, Walter S. 1920-2002 / Berḳovits, Eliʿezer 1908-1992 / Soloṿeyṭshiḳ, Yosef Dov 1903-1993 / Judaïsme orthodoxe
Classifications IxTheo:AB Philosophie de la religion
AG Vie religieuse
Sujets non-standardisés:B Leibowitz
B Modern Orthodoxy
B Euthyphro dilemma
B Soloveichik
B Jewish ethics
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:Modern orthodoxy often perceives itself and is perceived by others as a movement which grants more importance to moral considerations in its interpretation of halakha and in its general worldview than does the ultra-orthodox movement. Accordingly, modern orthodox rabbis are often referred to as more “moderate” than their ultra-orthodox counterparts, a term which seems to imply that they are more open to moral arguments and more likely to adopt, or to develop, moral interpretations of halakha. A study of some central figures like Walter Wurzburger, Eliezer Berkovits and Joseph B. Soloveitchick, however, indicates that the modern orthodox approach to morality is much more ambivalent. The purpose of this paper is to discuss this ambivalence and to speculate on its source.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-020-09744-0