Friend or Foe?: The Bishops of Metz in Monastic Historical Narrative, c. 1000–c. 1200
Monks writing at Saint-Clément, Metz, over roughly two hundred years produced conflicting images of Bishop Theodoric I (965-84). In earlier texts, he is the monks’ benefactor, in later sources, their foe. Historians have sought to flatten this contrast, partly because of their assumptions about mona...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
In: |
The journal of ecclesiastical history
Year: 2020, Volume: 71, Issue: 2, Pages: 253-269 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theodoricus, Metensis -984
/ Kloster Sankt Clemens Metz
/ Relic
/ Historiography
/ History 970-1200
|
IxTheo Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KBG France KCA Monasticism; religious orders KCD Hagiography; saints RB Church office; congregation |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Monks writing at Saint-Clément, Metz, over roughly two hundred years produced conflicting images of Bishop Theodoric I (965-84). In earlier texts, he is the monks’ benefactor, in later sources, their foe. Historians have sought to flatten this contrast, partly because of their assumptions about monastic reform. This paper offers an alternative reading that questions those assumptions. It suggests that the evolution of Theodoric's image reflects changing ideas about monastic reform and the proper relationship between bishops and monks. It also cautions against accepting narratives - medieval or modern - that obscure the fluidity of such ideas and relationships. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-7637 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of ecclesiastical history
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0022046919001192 |