Doctors Have no Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception

In an article in this journal, Christopher Cowley argues that we have ‘misunderstood the special nature of medicine, and have misunderstood the motivations of the conscientious objectors’. We have not. It is Cowley who has misunderstood the role of personal values in the profession of medicine. We a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Savulescu, Julian 1963- (Author) ; Schüklenk, Udo (Author)
Contributors: Hughes, Jonathan A. (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2017]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 162-170
IxTheo Classification:NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Justice
B Law
B Autonomy
B interests
B Professionalism
B Euthanasia
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:In an article in this journal, Christopher Cowley argues that we have ‘misunderstood the special nature of medicine, and have misunderstood the motivations of the conscientious objectors’. We have not. It is Cowley who has misunderstood the role of personal values in the profession of medicine. We argue that there should be better protections for patients from doctors' personal values and there should be more severe restrictions on the right to conscientious objection, particularly in relation to assisted dying. We argue that eligible patients could be guaranteed access to medical services that are subject to conscientious objections by: (1) removing a right to conscientious objection; (2) selecting candidates into relevant medical specialities or general practice who do not have objections; (3) demonopolizing the provision of these services away from the medical profession.
ISSN:1467-8519
Reference:Kritik in "Conscientious objection, professional duty and compromise (2018)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Bioethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12288