Assessing Papal Probabilities: A Reply to Joseph E. Blado

Joseph Blado critiqued my probabilistic arguments against Roman papal doctrines by deploying probability arguments, particularly Bayesian arguments, in favor of the papacy. He contends that there are good C-inductive arguments for papal doctrine that, taken together, add up to a good P-inductive arg...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perichoresis
Main Author: Walls, Jerry L. 1955- (Author)
Contributors: Blado, Joseph E. (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sciendo, De Gruyter [2020]
In: Perichoresis
IxTheo Classification:HA Bible
KCB Papacy
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Luz
B probability arguments
B Intertextuality
B papal doctrine
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727546997
003 DE-627
005 20230629092153.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200820s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2478/perc-2020-0031  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727546997 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727546997 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)155452134  |0 (DE-627)666286353  |0 (DE-576)348552297  |4 aut  |a Walls, Jerry L.  |d 1955- 
109 |a Walls, Jerry L. 1955-  |a Walls, Jerry 1955- 
245 1 0 |a Assessing Papal Probabilities  |b A Reply to Joseph E. Blado 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Joseph Blado critiqued my probabilistic arguments against Roman papal doctrines by deploying probability arguments, particularly Bayesian arguments, in favor of the papacy. He contends that there are good C-inductive arguments for papal doctrine that, taken together, add up to a good P-inductive argument. I argue that his inductive arguments fail, and moreover that there are three good C-inductive arguments against papal doctrine in the neighborhood of his failed arguments. I conclude by critiquing his retreat to what he calls ‘skeptical papalism’ as a last ditch sort of move to defend papal doctrine. 
600 1 4 |a Luz 
650 4 |a Intertextuality 
650 4 |a papal doctrine 
650 4 |a probability arguments 
652 |a HA:KCB:VB 
700 1 |a Blado, Joseph E.  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Perichoresis  |d Warsaw, Poland : Sciendo, De Gruyter, 2003  |g 18(2020), 5, Seite 105-116  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)730279154  |w (DE-600)2691385-9  |w (DE-576)375595902  |x 2284-7308  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2020  |g number:5  |g pages:105-116 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Blado, Joseph E.  |t On the Plausibility of the Papacy: Scaling the Walls of Contemporary Criticisms  |d 2022  |w (DE-627)1811869343 
856 |u https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/perc-2020-0031  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/perc/18/5/article-p105.xml  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2020-0031  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 18  |j 2020  |e 5  |h 105-116 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741381462 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727546997 
LOK |0 005 20230629092153 
LOK |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x Der kritisierte Artikel wurde erst 2022 im Heythrop Journal veröffentlicht, wurde aber schon 2019 verfasst. 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049499  |a KCB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204408X  |a HA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a BIB  |a REL