Mary and Fátima: A Modest C-Inductive Argument for Catholicism

C-Inductive arguments are arguments that increase the probability of a hypothesis. In this paper, we offer a C-Inductive argument for the Roman Catholic hypothesis. We specifically argue that one would expect the Miracle of Fátima on Roman Catholicism more so than on alternative hypotheses. Since ou...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: McNabb, Tyler Dalton ca. 20./21. Jh. (Auteur) ; Blado, Joseph E. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sciendo, De Gruyter [2020]
Dans: Perichoresis
Année: 2020, Volume: 18, Numéro: 5, Pages: 55-65
Classifications IxTheo:HA Bible
KAJ Époque contemporaine
KDB Église catholique romaine
NBJ Mariologie
VB Herméneutique; philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Swinburne
B Roman Catholicism
B Fátima
B Miracle of the Sun
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:C-Inductive arguments are arguments that increase the probability of a hypothesis. In this paper, we offer a C-Inductive argument for the Roman Catholic hypothesis. We specifically argue that one would expect the Miracle of Fátima on Roman Catholicism more so than on alternative hypotheses. Since our argument draws on confirmation theory, we first give a primer for how confirmation theory works. We then, provide the historical facts surrounding the Miracle of Fátima. We offer up two competing naturalistic explanations that attempt to explain the historical facts, but then, argue that a supernatural explanation is superior. Having established that something miraculous likely occurred at Fátima, we move to argue for the overall thesis of the paper. Finally, we engage several objections to our argument.
ISSN:2284-7308
Contient:Enthalten in: Perichoresis
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2478/perc-2020-0028