The epistemic and ethical onus of ‘One Health’
This paper argues that the practical reach and ethical impact of the One Health paradigm is conditional on satisfactorily distinguishing between interconnected and interdependent factors among human, non-human, and environmental health. Interconnection does not entail interdependence. Offering examp...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2019]
|
| В: |
Bioethics
Год: 2019, Том: 33, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 185-194 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | NCG Экологическая этика; этика мироздания NCH Медицинская этика |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Epistemic
B Ethical B Interconnection B Interdependence B One Health B Народное здравоохранение |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | This paper argues that the practical reach and ethical impact of the One Health paradigm is conditional on satisfactorily distinguishing between interconnected and interdependent factors among human, non-human, and environmental health. Interconnection does not entail interdependence. Offering examples of interconnections and interdependence in the context of existing One Health literature, we demonstrate that the conversations about One Health do not yet sufficiently differentiate between those concepts. They tend to either ignore such distinctions or embrace bioethically untenable positions. We conclude that careful conceptual differentiation can prevent One Health stakeholders either from over-reaching or under-reaching the practical and ethical boundaries of this developing paradigm. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-8519 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Bioethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12522 |
