Responsibility and the limits of patient choice

Patients are generally assumed to have the right to choices about treatment, including the right to refuse treatment, which is constrained by considerations of cost-effectiveness. Independently, many people support the idea that patients who are responsible for their ill health should incur penaltie...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davies, Benjamin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: 5, Pages: 459-466
IxTheo Classification:NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Choice
B public reasons
B Healthcare
B Responsibility
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727461339
003 DE-627
005 20211005021637.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200819s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12693  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727461339 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727461339 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1182242715  |0 (DE-627)166257908X  |4 aut  |a Davies, Benjamin 
109 |a Davies, Benjamin  |a Davies, Ben 
245 1 0 |a Responsibility and the limits of patient choice 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Patients are generally assumed to have the right to choices about treatment, including the right to refuse treatment, which is constrained by considerations of cost-effectiveness. Independently, many people support the idea that patients who are responsible for their ill health should incur penalties that non-responsible patients do not face. Surprisingly, these two areas have not received much joint attention. This paper considers whether restricting the scope of responsibility to pre-treatment decisions can be justified, or whether a demand to hold people responsible for 'usual suspect' choices such as smoking or failure to exercise commits us to also holding people responsible for their treatment choices. I argue that there is no good reason to support this restriction: those who advocate responsibility for (some) pre-treatment choices should also advocate responsibility for (some) treatment choices. However, I also note that, as with pre-treatment choices, patients may sometimes have reason to choose in ways that do not optimize their health. As such, I also consider a process, based on the idea of public reasons, for deciding which treatment choices patients cannot legitimately be held responsible for, along with a method for considering proposed changes to this category. 
601 |a Patient 
650 4 |a Choice 
650 4 |a Healthcare 
650 4 |a public reasons 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
652 |a NCH 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 34(2020), 5, Seite 459-466  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:5  |g pages:459-466 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12693  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12693  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12693  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 34  |j 2020  |e 5  |h 459-466 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741206539 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727461339 
LOK |0 005 20211005021637 
LOK |0 008 200819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw