Emotional Regulation and Responsibility
I argue that ones responsibility for ones emotions has a two-fold structure: one bears direct responsibility for emotions insofar as they are the upshot of first-order evaluative judgements concerning reasons of fit; and one bears derivative responsibility for them insofar as they are consequences...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2015]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2015, Volume: 18, Issue: 3, Pages: 487-500 |
IxTheo Classification: | NCB Personal ethics ZD Psychology |
Further subjects: | B
Reasons
B Regulation B Emotion B Responsibility |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | I argue that ones responsibility for ones emotions has a two-fold structure: one bears direct responsibility for emotions insofar as they are the upshot of first-order evaluative judgements concerning reasons of fit; and one bears derivative responsibility for them insofar as they are consequences of activities of emotional self-regulation, which can reflect ones take on second-order reasons concerning the strategic, prudential, or moral desirability of undergoing a particular emotion in a particular context. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-014-9535-7 |