How the Story Appears in the Patristic Literature

This essay explores the various ways that the Patristic writings interpreted three elements of the Gadarene Demoniac story (Matt 8:28–34) that are unique to Matthew’s telling: the number of demoniacs, and the phrases “before the time” and “no one could go through that way.” Concerning the number of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annali di storia dell'esegesi
Subtitles:Abweichender Titel:The Demoniacs in the Gospel of Matthew
Main Author: Hatter, Jonathan (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Ed. Dehoniane 2019
In: Annali di storia dell'esegesi
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Mark / Demonology / Patristics
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
NBH Angelology; demonology
Further subjects:B Interpretation of
B Bible . Matthew; Criticism, Narrative
B Demoniacs
B Matthew
B Patristic
B Reception
B Bible . Matthew; Criticism, interpretation
B Jesus Christ
B Bible; Criticism, interpretation; History0030-600
B Healing of the Gerasene demoniac (Miracle)
Description
Summary:This essay explores the various ways that the Patristic writings interpreted three elements of the Gadarene Demoniac story (Matt 8:28–34) that are unique to Matthew’s telling: the number of demoniacs, and the phrases “before the time” and “no one could go through that way.” Concerning the number of demoniacs, we see that while the earliest texts seem content to conflate details from multiple gospel accounts, later authors develop an interest in objective harmonization, offering unique interpretations for why Matthew has two demoniacs while the other versions of the story have only one. Concerning Jesus’s appearance “before the time,” there is a consensus among the authors that this should be understood in an apocalyptic framework, familiar from texts like Revelation and 1 Enoch. Finally, concerning the blocking of the way, we find that the early interpreters of the story were mostly silent on this Matthean detail, offering only a few limited comments.
ISSN:1120-4001
Contains:Enthalten in: Annali di storia dell'esegesi