Die Gottheit Gottes und die Wissenschaftlichkeit der Theologie: Pannenbergs kritische Aneignung empirischer Anthropologie und Gestrichs Vorwurf der natürlichen Theologie im Zusammenhang mit der Lehre von der Sünde
The discussion between Gestrich and Pannenberg about a contemporary hamartiology is marked by a difference in philosophy of science, along with broad similarities in content. The difference between the two dogmatic theologians is based on a contrary assessment of dialectical theology. Pannenberg dev...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2020]
|
In: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Year: 2020, Volume: 66, Issue: 3, Pages: 220-247 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Pannenberg, Wolfhart 1928-2014
/ Gestrich, Christof 1940-2018
/ Hamartiology
/ Theory of science
/ God
|
IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDD Protestant Church NBC Doctrine of God NBE Anthropology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | The discussion between Gestrich and Pannenberg about a contemporary hamartiology is marked by a difference in philosophy of science, along with broad similarities in content. The difference between the two dogmatic theologians is based on a contrary assessment of dialectical theology. Pannenberg developed his theological anthropology in dialogue with the natural sciences. This led to the suspicion that he wanted to verify theological statements in an empirical way. Thereby it was overlooked that Pannenberg’s epistemology was that of critical rationalism: In his Wissenschaftstheorie und Theologie he translated the affirmative statements of faith into the language of epistemology in order to bring faith’s claim to truth into dialogue with the contemporary accounts of truth. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2196-8020 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2020.66.3.220 |