Religious Studies for Cyborgs: Cognitive Science and Social Theory after Humanism
As it appears, the back and forth between CSR and critical theory pays a great deal of attention to religion as a classificatory and explanatory object but has thus far left alone another category—that of the human. Scholars in other fields, however, have long demonstrated the human subject to be a...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2020]
|
| En: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Año: 2020, Volumen: 32, Número: 3, Páginas: 276-287 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Posthumanismo
/ Cíborg
/ Teoría sociológica
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AA Ciencias de la religión AD Sociología de la religión AE Psicología de la religión |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Cognitive Science
B Media Theory B feminist science B Identity B Posthumanism |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | As it appears, the back and forth between CSR and critical theory pays a great deal of attention to religion as a classificatory and explanatory object but has thus far left alone another category—that of the human. Scholars in other fields, however, have long demonstrated the human subject to be a slippery trope all its own whose rhetorical and analytical value is not at all a given. It is on the evolution and contemporary state of this vein of criticism that I will focus, then, in an attempt to shift the register of the current conversation about CSR. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341484 |
