Religious Studies for Cyborgs: Cognitive Science and Social Theory after Humanism
As it appears, the back and forth between CSR and critical theory pays a great deal of attention to religion as a classificatory and explanatory object but has thus far left alone another category—that of the human. Scholars in other fields, however, have long demonstrated the human subject to be a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 32, Issue: 3, Pages: 276-287 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Post-humanism
/ Cyborgs
/ Sociological theory
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AD Sociology of religion; religious policy AE Psychology of religion |
| Further subjects: | B
Cognitive Science
B Media Theory B feminist science B Identity B Posthumanism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | As it appears, the back and forth between CSR and critical theory pays a great deal of attention to religion as a classificatory and explanatory object but has thus far left alone another category—that of the human. Scholars in other fields, however, have long demonstrated the human subject to be a slippery trope all its own whose rhetorical and analytical value is not at all a given. It is on the evolution and contemporary state of this vein of criticism that I will focus, then, in an attempt to shift the register of the current conversation about CSR. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341484 |
