Ego-Less Agency: Dharma-Responsiveness Without Kantian Autonomy
My critical focus in this article is on Rick Repetti's compatibilist conception of free will, and his apparent commitment to a Kantian conception of autonomy, which I argue is in direct conflict with the Buddhist doctrine of no-self. As an alternative, I defend a conception of ego-less agency t...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Review |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
| In: |
Zygon
Year: 2020, 卷: 55, 發布: 2, Pages: 497-518 |
| Review of: | Buddhism, meditation, and free will (Boca Raton, FL : Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis,, 2018) (Cummiskey, David)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism BL Buddhism NCB Personal ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
書評
B Free Will B Buddhism B Agency B Kantian B Pudgalavadin B No-self B Moral Responsibility B Autonomy B Christine Korsgaard B reason-responsiveness |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | My critical focus in this article is on Rick Repetti's compatibilist conception of free will, and his apparent commitment to a Kantian conception of autonomy, which I argue is in direct conflict with the Buddhist doctrine of no-self. As an alternative, I defend a conception of ego-less agency that I believe better coheres with core Buddhist teachings. In the course of the argument, I discuss the competing conceptions of free agency and autonomy defended by Harry Frankfurt, John Martin Fischer, Christine Korsgaard, and David Velleman. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Reference: | Kommentar in "A Defense of Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2020)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12601 |