Ego-Less Agency: Dharma-Responsiveness Without Kantian Autonomy
My critical focus in this article is on Rick Repetti's compatibilist conception of free will, and his apparent commitment to a Kantian conception of autonomy, which I argue is in direct conflict with the Buddhist doctrine of no-self. As an alternative, I defend a conception of ego-less agency t...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Revisar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2020]
|
| En: |
Zygon
Año: 2020, Volumen: 55, Número: 2, Páginas: 497-518 |
| Reseña de: | Buddhism, meditation, and free will (Boca Raton, FL : Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis,, 2018) (Cummiskey, David)
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión BL Budismo NCB Ética individual VA Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Free Will
B Buddhism B Agency B Kantian B Pudgalavadin B No-self B Reseña B Moral Responsibility B Autonomy B Christine Korsgaard B reason-responsiveness |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | My critical focus in this article is on Rick Repetti's compatibilist conception of free will, and his apparent commitment to a Kantian conception of autonomy, which I argue is in direct conflict with the Buddhist doctrine of no-self. As an alternative, I defend a conception of ego-less agency that I believe better coheres with core Buddhist teachings. In the course of the argument, I discuss the competing conceptions of free agency and autonomy defended by Harry Frankfurt, John Martin Fischer, Christine Korsgaard, and David Velleman. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Reference: | Kommentar in "A Defense of Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2020)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12601 |
