Moral Decisions About Human Germ-Line Modification

Technologies for human germ-line modification may soon enable humanity to create new types of human beings. Decisions about use of this power entail an unprecedented combination of difficulties: the stakes are immense, the unknowns are daunting, and moral principles are called into question. Evolved...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adams, Roger R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- [2020]
In: Zygon
Year: 2020, Volume: 55, Issue: 2, Pages: 430-443
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B CRISP/Cas method / Enhancement (Medical ethics) / Decision / Science ethics
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NCH Medical ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Religion and science
B CRISPR
B Morality
B Evolution
B Genetics
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Technologies for human germ-line modification may soon enable humanity to create new types of human beings. Decisions about use of this power entail an unprecedented combination of difficulties: the stakes are immense, the unknowns are daunting, and moral principles are called into question. Evolved morality is not a sure basis for these decisions, both because of its inherent imperfections and because genetic engineering could eventually change humans’ innate cognitive mechanisms. Nevertheless, consensus is needed on moral values relevant to germ-line modification. These values could be based on characteristics of human beings that would remain constant regardless of revised genomes.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contains:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12592