Chrestiani, Christiani, Χριστιανοί: a Second Century Anachronism?
Brent D. Shaw has questioned the historicity of the Neronian persecution based on two arguments from silence: Tacitus’s use of the term “Christians” is an anachronism; and Suetonius knows of no connection between the fire in Rome and Nero’s police actions against the Christians. Both of these untest...
| Subtitles: | Chrestiani, Christiani, Christianoi$da Second Century Anachronism? |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Year: 2020, Volume: 74, Issue: 3, Pages: 237-264 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CG Christianity and Politics KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KBJ Italy |
| Further subjects: | B
Neronian persecution
B Christiani B Chrestiani |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Brent D. Shaw has questioned the historicity of the Neronian persecution based on two arguments from silence: Tacitus’s use of the term “Christians” is an anachronism; and Suetonius knows of no connection between the fire in Rome and Nero’s police actions against the Christians. Both of these untestable arguments from silence are inherently weak logically. One can make a good case for the claim that Chrestianus, Christianus, and Χριστιανός are not creations of the second century and that Roman officials were probably aware of the Chrestiani in the 60s. Tacitus’s and Suetonius’s accounts of the persecution are fundamentally reliable. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341410 |