Interrogating Healthy Conflict
The need to turn an enemy into an adversary is an ethical obligation. I try to show that this obligation has multiple religious and philosophical resources. The ethical imperative also requires us to not overstate and magnify any problem at hand to the point that it becomes insurmountable and enmity...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 48, Issue: 2, Pages: 289-298 |
Review of: | Healthy conflict in contemporary American society (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2018) (Moosa, Ebrahim)
|
IxTheo Classification: | NCC Social ethics NCD Political ethics ZC Politics in general |
Further subjects: | B
Beauty
B Book review B Emmanuel Levinas B Conflict B Jacques Derrida B Qurʾān B Colin Kaepernick B Other |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | The need to turn an enemy into an adversary is an ethical obligation. I try to show that this obligation has multiple religious and philosophical resources. The ethical imperative also requires us to not overstate and magnify any problem at hand to the point that it becomes insurmountable and enmity becomes an end in itself. I do ask the question whether Springs thinks of Colin Kaepernick’s peaceful protest by taking the knee at football games as an instance of healthy conflict. Are the terms peace and healthy conflict perhaps not better viewed as allegories for the interrogation of the human condition? Perhaps healthy conflict remains a series of questions rather than concrete outcomes. |
---|---|
Item Description: | Book discussion |
ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Healthy Conflict in an Era of Intractability (2020)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12312 |