The Chronology of John the Baptist and the Crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth: A New Approach
The consensus of present-day historians that Jesus was crucified around the year 30 ce has been challenged by a minority of scholars who argue that the execution of John the Baptist could not take place earlier than 35 ce, and for that reason Jesus must have been crucified at the Passover of 36 ce....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Year: 2020, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-34 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Historicity
/ John the Baptist
/ Chronology
/ Death
/ Death
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
John the Baptist
B Crucifixion B Chronology B Collective Memory |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The consensus of present-day historians that Jesus was crucified around the year 30 ce has been challenged by a minority of scholars who argue that the execution of John the Baptist could not take place earlier than 35 ce, and for that reason Jesus must have been crucified at the Passover of 36 ce. This paper argues that both parties have strong and convincing arguments, and for that reason we must conclude that John was probably executed after Jesus’ death. The collective memory of the early Christians did not succeed in retaining the chronological order of these events, and this circumstance allowed the synoptics to turn the Baptist into a forerunner of Christ. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-2019003 |