The Nature of Punishment Revisited: Reply to Wringe

This paper continues a debate about the following claim: an agent punishes someone only if she aims to harm him. In a series of papers, Bill Wringe argues that this claim is false, I criticize his arguments, and he replies. Here, I argue that his reply fails.

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hanna, Nathan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: [2020]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2020, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 89-100
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCA Ethics
VA Philosophy
ZA Social sciences
Further subjects:B Punishment
B Harm
B Intention
Online Access: Volltext (Publisher)
Description
Summary:This paper continues a debate about the following claim: an agent punishes someone only if she aims to harm him. In a series of papers, Bill Wringe argues that this claim is false, I criticize his arguments, and he replies. Here, I argue that his reply fails.
ISSN:1572-8447
Reference:Kritik von "Punishment, Jesters and Judges (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-019-10047-1