A Life Plan Principle of Voting Rights

Who should have a right to participate in a polity's decision-making? Although the answers to this ‘boundary problem' in democratic theory remain controversial, it is widely believed that the enfranchisement of tourists and children is unacceptable. Yet, the two most prominent inclusion pr...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Angell, Kim (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2020]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2020, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 125-139
Further subjects:B Life plans
B All-affected
B Boundary Problem
B Democratic theory
B Enfranchisement
B Voting Rights
B Personal Autonomy
B All-subjected
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1694953475
003 DE-627
005 20200420092506.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200420s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-019-10046-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1694953475 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1694953475 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Angell, Kim  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Life Plan Principle of Voting Rights 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Who should have a right to participate in a polity's decision-making? Although the answers to this ‘boundary problem' in democratic theory remain controversial, it is widely believed that the enfranchisement of tourists and children is unacceptable. Yet, the two most prominent inclusion principles in the literature - Robert Goodin's ‘all (possibly) affected interests'-principle and the ‘all subjected to law'-principle - both enfranchise those groups. Unsurprisingly, democratic theorists have therefore offered several reasons for nonetheless exempting tourists and children from the franchise. In this paper, I argue that their attempts fail. None of the proposed rationales can do the job without having unacceptable implications for the voting rights of other groups. I then develop a new specification of the affected interests-view, one that avoids such problems. According to my life plan-principle, a person is entitled to participate in a polity's decision-making if and only if its decisions will actually affect her autonomously chosen life plans, or prevent her from developing or revising plans of that kind. I show that this principle straightforwardly avoids enfranchising tourists and children, and thus improves upon its two prominent rivals. The paper ends by considering and rejecting two objections to my new principle. 
650 4 |a All-affected 
650 4 |a All-subjected 
650 4 |a Boundary Problem 
650 4 |a Democratic theory 
650 4 |a Enfranchisement 
650 4 |a Life plans 
650 4 |a Personal Autonomy 
650 4 |a Voting Rights 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 23(2020), 1, Seite 125-139  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:125-139 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-019-10046-2.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10046-2  |x Verlag 
936 u w |d 23  |j 2020  |e 1  |h 125-139 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3626974804 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1694953475 
LOK |0 005 20200420092506 
LOK |0 008 200420||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw