The Origin of the de Boor Fragments Ascribed to Philip of Side

The de Boor Fragments, inserted within a seventh-century epitome of the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius of Caesarea, are remarkable for preserving snippets of the lost writings of Papias of Hierapolis, Hegesippus, Pierius of Alexandria, and (as now revealed) Eusebius. A new and expanded edition o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stevens, Luke J. ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [2018]
In: Journal of early Christian studies
Year: 2018, Volume: 26, Issue: 4, Pages: 631-657
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Papias, Hierapolitanus ca. 1./2. Jh. / Hegesippus 100-180 / Pierius Saint ca. 3./4. Jh. / Eusebius of Caesarea 260-339 / Handwriting / Fragment
IxTheo Classification:CD Christianity and Culture
KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The de Boor Fragments, inserted within a seventh-century epitome of the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius of Caesarea, are remarkable for preserving snippets of the lost writings of Papias of Hierapolis, Hegesippus, Pierius of Alexandria, and (as now revealed) Eusebius. A new and expanded edition of the fragments is here provided. Special attention is paid to the fragments on Papias, which until now have been presented misleadingly, one of which apparently comes not directly from Papias but from an early intermediary also used independently by George the Monk. While de Boor tentatively ascribed the fragments to Philip of Side, the evidence is here examined that they originate not from Philip but from two strata: some from early scholia in a copy of Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, and the rest added by the seventh-century epitomist whose work has preserved the fragments. The scholia, in turn, likely originated in the lost continuation of Eusebius's work by Gelasius of Caesarea and were presumably composed by Gelasius himself.
ISSN:1086-3184
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of early Christian studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/earl.2018.0054