Two Touchstones for Philosophy: Naive Experience and Common Sense
In this paper I explore, in sections 2 and 3, respectively, Herman Dooyeweerd's notion of naive experience and the notion of common sense as found in the writings of Thomas Reid and G. E. Moore. I argue in section 4 that naive experience and common sense are assigned a structurally similar func...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
[2020]
|
| En: |
Philosophia reformata
Año: 2020, Volumen: 85, Número: 1, Páginas: 20-42 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | TJ Edad Moderna TK Período contemporáneo VA Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Herman Dooyeweerd
B naive experience B Thomas Reid B G. E. Moore B Sentido común B philosophical method |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Sumario: | In this paper I explore, in sections 2 and 3, respectively, Herman Dooyeweerd's notion of naive experience and the notion of common sense as found in the writings of Thomas Reid and G. E. Moore. I argue in section 4 that naive experience and common sense are assigned a structurally similar functional role by their advocates—viz., the role of touchstone for philosophy. In the final section I stage a conversation between Dooyeweerd and Reid about the touchstones they adopt. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Philosophia reformata
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/23528230-08501002 |
