The Naivete of Neville's Religion: A Celebratory Yet Despairing Reading

A detailed review of the theory of religion presented by Robert Cummings Neville in Religion, the third and concluding volume of his Philosophical Theology, leads into a critical response to Neville's notions of symbolic engagement of ultimacy and second naivete. The approach is framed by conce...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Irvine, Andrew B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Illinois Press [2019]
In: American journal of theology & philosophy
Year: 2019, Volume: 40, Issue: 3, Pages: 65-81
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
TK Recent history
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:A detailed review of the theory of religion presented by Robert Cummings Neville in Religion, the third and concluding volume of his Philosophical Theology, leads into a critical response to Neville's notions of symbolic engagement of ultimacy and second naivete. The approach is framed by concern for our perilous ecological and human future. It is both philosophical and literary in form, and driven by the haunting role of nothing in Neville's account of the contingency of ultimate reality(ies). Neville's theory of religion is distinguished from and far superior to reigning ways of seeing the subject in the fields of confessional theology and religious studies. However, the present response comes to focus with a celebratory yet despairing appreciation of the possibility of second naivete in religion. It aims to show, as much as say, that the normative commendation of ontological faith, which consummates Neville's theology, may rest in part on personal dispositions that, hard though it is to believe, underplay the despair bred by religious life engaged with persistent nothing, the ultimate contingency of nature and being.
ISSN:2156-4795
Reference:Kritik in "A Response to the End of the Bob Era (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: American journal of theology & philosophy
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5406/amerjtheophil.40.3.0065