The Textual Traditions of Acts: What has Discourse Analysis Contributed?
This article assesses Jenny Read-Heimerdinger's application of discourse analysis to the problem of the two textual traditions of the book of Acts. Based on an analysis of the textual variants of the Apostolic Decree and a consideration of Jewish perspective of both traditions, this article con...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2019]
|
| In: |
Biblica
Year: 2019, Volume: 100, Issue: 4, Pages: 560-583 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Read-Heimerdinger, Jenny 1950-
/ Acts of the Apostles
/ Bible. Apostelgeschichte 15,20
/ Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis
/ Discourse analysis
/ Textual criticism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article assesses Jenny Read-Heimerdinger's application of discourse analysis to the problem of the two textual traditions of the book of Acts. Based on an analysis of the textual variants of the Apostolic Decree and a consideration of Jewish perspective of both traditions, this article concludes, contrary to Read-Heimerdinger, that the Alexandrian tradition is more likely to represent the original text and contains a more Jewish-oriented perspective, which calls her application of discourse analysis into question and reaffirms the primacy of the Alexandrian text. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2385-2062 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/BIB.100.4.3287297 |