Joseph Ratzinger's Debates with Gisbert Greshake: An Argument for the Resurrection of Matter
Debates in eschatology have been unresolved regarding the place of earthly matter in the resurrection. I analyze the positions of Joseph Ratzinger and Gisbert Greshake and argue in favor of Ratzinger's position. He defends a transphysical bodily resurrection that involves the matter of this wor...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
| In: |
Modern theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 36, Issue: 2, Pages: 239-258 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Benedikt, XVI., Pope 1927-2022
/ Greshake, Gisbert 1933-
/ Eschatology
/ Resurrection
/ Body
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KDB Roman Catholic Church NBE Anthropology NBQ Eschatology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Debates in eschatology have been unresolved regarding the place of earthly matter in the resurrection. I analyze the positions of Joseph Ratzinger and Gisbert Greshake and argue in favor of Ratzinger's position. He defends a transphysical bodily resurrection that involves the matter of this world over against Greshake's resurrection in death eschatology and anthropology that entails the resurrection of a phenomenological but not a physical body. What is at stake in this debate is nothing less than the meaning of creation in God's salvific economy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-0025 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Modern theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/moth.12493 |