A debate on God and morality: what is the best account of objective moral values and duties?
"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objecti...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; |
| Format: | Print Book |
| Language: | English |
| Subito Delivery Service: | Order now. |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
New York London
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2021
|
| In: | Year: 2021 |
| Volumes / Articles: | Show volumes/articles. |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Ethics
/ Foundations of
/ Existence of God
/ Religious philosophy
B Ethics / Universality / Theism / Controversy |
| Further subjects: | B
Collection of essays
B Ethics B Moral Realism B Theism B Atheism B God |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1691488437 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210705235614.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200303s2021 xxu||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 010 | |a 2020010395 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780367135652 |c pbk. : GBP 32.99 |9 978-0-367-13565-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780367135645 |c hbk |9 978-0-367-13564-5 | ||
| 024 | 3 | |a 9780367135652 | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1691488437 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1691488437 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1220887582 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |c XD-US | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BJ1031 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 170/.42 |q LOC | |
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a BK 2015 |q DE-24/20sred |2 rvk |0 (DE-625)rvk/11848: | ||
| 084 | |a 08.37 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 08.38 |2 bkl | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A debate on God and morality |b what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? |c William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson ; with David Baggett [und 4 anderen] |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |a London |b Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |a xii, 234 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 520 | |a "In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms"-- | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 0 | |a God | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Atheism | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Moral Realism | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Aufsatzsammlung |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |0 (DE-627)105605727 |0 (DE-576)209726091 |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |0 (DE-627)106335987 |0 (DE-576)208912614 |2 gnd |a Ethik |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4005252-7 |0 (DE-627)106382357 |0 (DE-576)208859934 |2 gnd |a Begründung |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4131943-6 |0 (DE-627)10415165X |0 (DE-576)209631457 |2 gnd |a Gottesfrage |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049415-9 |0 (DE-627)104598581 |0 (DE-576)209081953 |2 gnd |a Religionsphilosophie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |0 (DE-627)106335987 |0 (DE-576)208912614 |2 gnd |a Ethik |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4186918-7 |0 (DE-627)105276022 |0 (DE-576)210042400 |2 gnd |a Universalität |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
| 689 | 1 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4128337-5 |0 (DE-627)105718076 |0 (DE-576)209601264 |2 gnd |a Kontroverse |
| 689 | 1 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)123518385 |0 (DE-627)035334142 |0 (DE-576)160636663 |4 aut |a Craig, William Lane |d 1949- | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)173804330 |0 (DE-627)698707974 |0 (DE-576)134644093 |4 aut |a Wielenberg, Erik J. |d 1972- | |
| 700 | 1 | |e HerausgeberIn |0 (DE-588)1236507924 |0 (DE-627)1761865056 |4 edt |a Johnson, Adam Lloyd | |
| 700 | 1 | |e MitwirkendeR |0 (DE-588)1014275431 |0 (DE-627)66627052X |0 (DE-576)26474893X |4 ctb |a Baggett, David |d 1965- | |
| 776 | 1 | |z 9781003055259 |c ebk | |
| 936 | r | v | |a BK 2015 |b Sittliche Erkenntnis (das Gute, der Wert) |k Theologische Ethik/Moraltheologie |k Allgemeine Moraltheologie/Ethische Grundbegriffe |k Sittliche Erkenntnis (das Gute, der Wert) |0 (DE-627)1270724924 |0 (DE-625)rvk/11848: |0 (DE-576)200724924 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 08.37 |j Religionsphilosophie |q DA-3 |0 (DE-627)106405578 |
| 936 | b | k | |a 08.38 |j Ethik |q DA-3 |0 (DE-627)10640265X |
| 951 | |a BO | ||
| ACO | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheob001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SPR | |a 1 |t IXT | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Controversy,Ethics,Ethics,Moral philosophy,Philosophical Ethics,Ethics,Existence of God,God,God question,Foundations of,Grounds for,Reasons for,Arguments for,Religious philosophy,Philosophy of religion,Religion,Theism,Universality |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Controverse,Justification,Philosophie des religions,Question de l’existence de Dieu,Théisme,Universalité,Éthique,Éthique,Morale,Morale,Morale |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Controversia,Cuestión de la existencia de Dios,Filosofía de religión,Justificación,Teísmo,Universalidad,Ética,Ética,Ética moderna |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Controversia,Etica,Etica,Filosofia della religione,Motivazione,Giustificazione,Giustificazione,Questione dell'esistenza di Dio,Teismo,Universalità |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 争论,争议,伦理学,道德哲学,道德学,宗教哲学,普遍性,有神论,根据,神存在的提问,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提问 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 倫理學,道德哲學,道德學,宗教哲學,普遍性,有神論,根據,爭論,爭議,神存在的提問,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提問 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Controvérsia,Filosofia da religião,Justificativa,Justificação,Justificação,Questão da existência de Deus,Teísmo,Universalidade,Ética,Ética |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Вопрос о существовании Бога,Обоснование,Спорный вопрос,Теизм,Универсальность,Философия религии,Этика (мотив),Этика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αιτιολόγηση,Ισχυρισμός,Διαμάχη,Ερώτημα της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Ηθική (μοτίβο),Ηθική,Θεϊσμός,Καθολικότητα,Οικουμενικότητα,Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Ethics,Moral,Morality,Moralphilosophie,Tugend,Wertethik,Ethische Theorie,Moral,Philosophische Ethik,Sittenlehre,Moralphilosophie , Existenz Gottes , Ethics,Moral,Morality,Moralphilosophie,Tugend,Wertethik,Ethische Theorie,Moral,Philosophische Ethik,Sittenlehre,Moralphilosophie , Richtungsstreit,Kontroversen |