Pascal, Pascalberg, and friends

Pascal's wager has to face the many gods objection. The wager goes wrong when it asks us to chose between Christianity and atheism, as if there are no other options. Some have argued that we're entitled to dismiss exotic, bizarre, or subjectively unappealing religions from the scope of the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal for philosophy of religion
Main Author: Lebens, Samuel 1983- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V [2020]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 87, Issue: 1, Pages: 109-130
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Pascal, Blaise 1623-1662 / Truth / Christianity / Atheism / Judaism / Islam
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AX Inter-religious relations
CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:Pascal's wager has to face the many gods objection. The wager goes wrong when it asks us to chose between Christianity and atheism, as if there are no other options. Some have argued that we're entitled to dismiss exotic, bizarre, or subjectively unappealing religions from the scope of the wager. But they have provided no satisfying justification for such a radical wager-saving dispensation. This paper fills that dialectical gap. It argues that some agents are blameless or even praiseworthy for ignoring all but one religion as they face the wager. The argument leads us to multiple Pascals: a Jewish one, a Christian one, a Muslim one, and more.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-019-09734-x