Aristotelian Diagrams in the Debate on Future Contingents
In the recent debate on future contingents and the nature of the future, authors such as G. A. Boyd, W. L. Craig, and E. Hess have made use of various logical notions, such as (the difference between) the Aristotelian relations of contradiction and contrariety, and the open future square of opposit...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
[2019]
|
| En: |
Sophia
Año: 2019, Volumen: 58, Número: 3, Páginas: 321-329 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión VB Hermenéutica ; Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Future contingents
B Open Theism B Aristotelian diagrams B Hexagon of opposition B Gregory Boyd B Square of opposition |
| Acceso en línea: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Sumario: | In the recent debate on future contingents and the nature of the future, authors such as G. A. Boyd, W. L. Craig, and E. Hess have made use of various logical notions, such as (the difference between) the Aristotelian relations of contradiction and contrariety, and the open future square of opposition.' My aim in this paper is not to enter into this philosophical debate itself, but rather to highlight, at a more abstract methodological level, the important role that Aristotelian diagrams (such as the open future square of opposition, but also others) can play in organizing and clarifying the debate. After providing a brief survey of the specific ways in which Boyd and Hess make use of Aristotelian relations and diagrams in the debate on the nature of the future, I argue that the position of open theism is best represented by means of a hexagon of opposition (rather than a square of opposition). Next, I show that on the classical theist account, this hexagon of opposition collapses' into a single pair of contradictory statements. This collapse from a hexagon into a pair has several aspects, which can all be seen as different manifestations of a single underlying change (viz., the move from a tripartition to a bipartition of logical space). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-017-0632-7 |